Not Ignoring Anyone on Purpose,
>> April 23, 2010
I promise. Some things are in the works right now. Don't want to let the kitty out of the bag yet, but I think it'll be pretty cool.
Meanwhile, here is some Rule 5 action to tide you over...
ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis Praises Socialism. Whodathunkit?
>> April 21, 2010
Wow. Really? C'mon, I know you're joking, right?
ACORN chief organizer Bertha Lewis' speech has been analyzed all over the blogosphere today at various and sundry blogs and newsier outlets so, I'll just let the lady do her thang. You can make up your own mind.
Found first at Newsbusters,
then at Verum Serum, Big Government, and American Spectator.
Dozens Gather For 4/20 Pot Protest, Somewhere
A few dozen protesters across the nation gathered in parks and allegedly at the nation's capitol to protest for the legalization of marijuana, a substance they see as no more dangerous than alcohol. At 4:20 pm, the protesters lit up joints and smoked them in plain view of God and everyone, then promptly forgot why they were there, leaving sadly, not much else to report, dude.
One protester, when approached by a reporter, was overheard asking "Yea, man, what did you guys want?" in a voice vaguely similar to Tommy Chong.
More on the NORML protest can be found here and here.
Now, what was I supposed to be doing before I got sidetracked?
Democrats Attempt to Sidestep Constitution AGAIN!
>> April 20, 2010
Here's an idea, Let's PRETEND D.C. is a State! Yea, you know, like we were going to pretend we passed a Health care bill? Only this time let's add two Congress people to the roll call! FROM D.C. which is not a state. or congressional district!
To become a state, you need a constitutional amendment and a two thirds majority vote in favor.
They plan to vote on this Thursday!
When will these treasonous SOB's quit?
Read on - from Julie in my local TEA Party:
House Attempts to Invent DC Congressmen this Thursday!
The D.C. House Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional. Tell your Representative to vote NO on H.R. 157!
Read more...
- Subvert the District Clause of the U.S. Constitution - Article I, Section 8, clause 17 - which makes clear that D.C. is a federal city, not a state, with final governing authority resting with Congress. The U.S. Constitution states that the House shall be composed of "Members chosen...by the People of the several States," not delegates representing non-state territories.
- Silence critics of D.C. voting rights by buying them off with a "sure Republican" seat because they know the D.C. seat will be a solid Democrat. In the last 12 elections since D.C. was granted the right to cast presidential electoral votes, it has never cast less than 74.8 percent of its popular vote for the Democratic presidential candidate. This move is simply a partisan trade-off by the congressional liberal Majority wanting to add a permanent Democrat vote to their tallies.
- Bribe Republicans to favor the idea by including a provision to increase the number of House Members from 435 to 437 and give the extra Representative to Utah.
- Lay the initial groundwork for achieving the ultimate goal of establishing two permanent Democrat Senate seats for the District. If the initial inclination is for DC to be "considered a Congressional district for purposes of representation in the House of Representatives," then the idea for DC to be "considered a state for the purposes of representation in the U.S. Senate," will not be far down the road.
Simply introducing a bill such as this is unconstitutional! DC cannot be "treated as though it were a congressional district," unless it were formally made a congressional district via a constitutional amendment, which would require a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress as well as three-fourths of the states to ratify it.This is nothing new from the Left. Congressional liberals have been trying to grant full voting rights to the District of Columbia since the 1980s. The maiden attempt to amend the U.S. Constitution through the "D.C. Representation" Amendment was unsuccessful, after it passed Congress but was rejected by the American people and died on August 22, 1985 after a decisive majority of 34 of the 50 states refused to ratify it. Now, Members of Congress are attempting to forgo the constitutional process and slip one past the American people in order to accommodate their political agenda!Remember, the Senate passed its version of the DC Voting bill (S. 160) by a vote of 61 to 37 (Roll Call 73) in February 2009. However, that bill stalled in the House because it contained a Senate Republican-offered amendment which repealed strict DC gun laws. Although the language of H.R. 157 has not yet been made public, the bill is expected to contain either the same or similar gun provisions, and although many House liberals favor DC gun control laws, it is likely that the liberal House leadership will approach this legislation in much the same way it did Obamacare: Pass it now, fix it later.TAKE ACTION!The House is scheduled to vote on H.R. 157 on Thursday, April 22, 2010! Please call and email your representatives and tell them to vote NO on this unconstitutional bill!Be sure to focus your calls on Republicans and Democrats alike, as various Republican "moderates" have been known to support this attempted scheme in the past and some Democrat "moderates" have opposed it.Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121
Further Reading:Liberal Plans to Subvert the U.S. Constitution by Phyllis SchlaflyThe Unconstitutional Compromise by George WillWhy the DC House Voting Rights Act is Unconstitutional by Professor Jonathan Turley
Christina Hendricks vs Adriana Lima vs Megan Fox
What do you think of this development? In the ultimate Rule 5 goodness, Esquire magazine hands the Robot a reason to include these three beauties in a single post! Not that I really needed one, mind you.
In a shocking, shocking! report, Esquire magazine's latest poll of 10,000 -wait for it- women(!) ranked Christina Hendricks as the best looking female, knocking Megan Fox down to number three with model Adriana Lima coming in second.
Let's just see about that...
Here's Christina Hendricks:
Adriana Lima:
Now Megan Fox:
To be honest, I'm having a tough time picking the winner. This will definitely require more study, to be sure.
Read more...
The Classic Liberal Nails It Again...
>> April 19, 2010
What's gotten into this guy lately? He's on FIRE!
You, the Tea Partiers, are not the violent racists the Establishment claims you are. They are merely reflecting their own shadows onto the movement. Ignore their abuse.
The Truth About Anti-Tea Party Propaganda
Read more...Best Sermon I've Seen In A Long While
From DeanO
THE TRIBULATION - Dr. Jack Trieber
Double click for full screen.
Dhimmitude
I thought it was an insult or a put-down like "Don't bring the dhimmitude, dude!". Turns out it is, but in a larger sense.
Via email from TEA Party members. Thanks Brad and Steve!
Had never heard the word until now---Type it
into Google and start reading. Pretty interesting. Note that
Muslims and certain other religions are exempt from the
Obamacare penalties and it is supported by law. We are
surrendering from within! Obama is leading us right down
the path to total control!
Dhimmitude
Dhimmitude is the Muslim system of controlling
non-muslim populations conquered through jihad. Specifically,
it is the TAXING of non-muslims in exchange for tolerating
their presence AND as a coercive means of converting
conquered remnants to islam.
The ObamaCare bill is the establishment of
Dhimmitude and Sharia muslim diktat in the United States .
Muslims are specifically exempted from the government
mandate to purchase insurance, and also from the penalty tax
for being uninsured. Islam considers insurance to be
"gambling", "risk-taking" and "usury" and is thus banned.
Muslims are specifically granted exemption based on this.
How convenient. So I, a Christian, will have crippling IRS
liens placed against all of my assets, including real estate,
cattle, and even accounts receivables, and will face hard
prison time because I refuse to buy insurance or pay the
penalty tax. Meanwhile, Louis Farrakhan will have no such
penalty and will have 100% of his health needs paid for by
the de facto government insurance. Non-muslims will be
paying a tax to subsidize muslims. Period. This is
Dhimmitude.
Dhimmitude serves two purposes: it enriches
the muslim masters AND serves to drive conversions to islam.
In this case, the incentive to convert to islam will be
taken up by those in the inner-cities as well as the godless
Generation X, Y and Z types who have no moral anchor. If you
don't believe in Christ to begin with, it is no problem
whatsoever to sell Him for 30 pieces of silver. "Sure, I'll
be a muslim if it means free health insurance and no taxes.
Where do I sign, bro?"
Now look at what they are teaching and not teaching in the schools...
Wake up folks! Read more...
US Military Prevails Despite President Obummer's Apologetic Stance on Terrorism
The top 2 al-Quaida operatives in Iraq have been introduced to their virgins thanks to our brave and selfless soldiers. God bless them. The soldiers, that is.
Full story here. Read more...
U.S. forces commander Gen. Raymond Odierno praised the operation.
"The death of these terrorists is potentially the most significant blow to al-Qaida in Iraq since the beginning of the insurgency," he said. "There is still work to do but this is a significant step forward in ridding Iraq of terrorists."
Cap & Tax Lite
In the Will They Ever Learn Department:
Senator Linsey Graham R(ino) from S.C along with his Democrat handlers have decided once again that those dangerous carbon emissions are more important than jobs or your economic security. The new energy proposal promises higher taxes on gasoline, which will be tacked on to the existing taxes on gasoline.
I hear the bill also contains the requirement to buy carbon credits that I suppose one could purchase if you breathe too heavily while exerting all the extra effort needed to earn the money to pay for the carbon credits. *pant*
Enough already! When will these morans realize that we don't need or want higher taxes. We need jobs. But that's not the objective is it? Sadly it is not. The Democrats' purpose with this and any new bill of late is more control over your life by telling you what you are allowed to do. Granted, they don't come out and say a person can't drive across country, but they will make it so expensive as to be financially impossible. What happened to liberty?
They continue marching on the the Al Gore drumbeat of a fake Global Warming hoax. Man did not cause the climate to change, if it is changing at all, the cause is far from man-made. Has anyone noticed a large plume of ash currently circling the atmosphere? Was that man-made? Has anyone heard of climate cycles?
The only thing Republicans should be doing right now is digging in their heels and saying no to everything this regime proposes. Bi-partisan should be a word we don't hear for the next three years!
The Senators writing the legislation are dangling the carrot of offshore drilling in an attempt to sucker in some support for the legislation. I say don't reach for it. After the Health Care fiasco, I'm against anything, ANYTHING this congress wants to do.
In the words of Nancy Reagan, Just. Say. No.
The Robot is a Proud Great-Uncle!
>> April 18, 2010
And by great, I mean outstanding! Excellent even!
Can't stay on politics all the time. I'll share a piece of the real world with you...
Say hey to my nephew and his wife's new bundle of joy!
That's a happy little dude.
You know, this motivator thing can be addicting.
Read more...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
.gif)
Posts
